U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright and Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin visited the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility last week to spotlight the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in American scientific and energy innovation. The visit was part of a broader national effort to promote initiatives funded by President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB)—a sweeping policy package supporting domestic energy production, nuclear science, and emerging technologies like AI.

Jefferson Lab, already known for its leadership in nuclear physics research, is now taking on a greater role in the Department of Energy’s (DOE) AI strategy. Secretary Wright toured the lab’s facilities—including the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF)—and received updates on the MOLLER experiment, a major research project with national implications.

The DOE has emphasized the value of integrating AI with high-performance scientific infrastructure. These investments, officials argue, will help the U.S. maintain technological leadership, build a skilled workforce, and gain strategic advantages in energy, defense, and research.

Rising Environmental Concerns

However, as the federal government accelerates AI development at national labs like Jefferson, critics have raised concerns over the environmental impact of these initiatives—particularly the energy and water consumption associated with large-scale AI systems.

Training advanced AI models requires immense computing power. That power not only draws substantial electricity—often sourced from fossil fuels—but also demands significant amounts of water to cool the data centers that run these systems. A 2023 study estimated that training a single large AI model could consume millions of liters of freshwater, depending on its size and the location of the data center.

With DOE-funded labs increasing their AI research and computing capacity under OBBB, environmental advocates are warning that the resource footprint of AI is being overlooked in the push for innovation.

“These are not lightweight systems,” said one policy expert in a recent report. “They rely on massive infrastructure and have measurable impacts on power grids and water supplies—especially in areas already facing resource strain.”

Calls for Transparency and Sustainability

In addition to resource consumption, watchdog groups have raised concerns about the lack of transparency in how OBBB funds are being allocated, and whether sustainability standards are being enforced at the pace of AI expansion.

The Department of Energy has stated that energy efficiency and emissions reduction remain part of its long-term goals. Still, critics argue that stronger guardrails are needed now, before AI infrastructure becomes deeply embedded in federal research programs.

With Jefferson Lab taking on a central role in both nuclear research and AI development, it has become a symbol of the broader debate: how to harness powerful technologies while remaining accountable to environmental and social impacts.

Want to read more about AI? Recently, one of our contributors wrote an interesting use-case for artificial intelligence in the field and when planning projects. Read it here.