EPA's Hydraulic Fracturing Research
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently announced the next steps in its congressionally mandated hydraulic fracturing study, identifying seven case studies to help inform the assessment of potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in keeping with the administration’s focus to ensure that the agency leverages domestic resources safely and responsibly, recently announced the next steps in its congressionally mandated hydraulic fracturing study. EPA has identified seven case studies to help inform the assessment of potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources. The sites identified were selected following extensive input from stakeholders – including the public, local and state officials, industry and environmental organizations. To ensure the agency maintains the current timeline for the study, the EPA has begun field work in some of the selected regions.
Natural gas plays a key role in the nation’s energy future. EPA is working closely with other federal partners to ensure that this important resource can be developed safely. “This is an important part of a process that will use the best science to help us better understand the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water,” says Paul Anastas, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Research and Development. “We’ve met with community members, state experts, and industry and environmental leaders to choose these case studies. This is about using the best possible science to do what the American people expect the EPA to do – ensure that the health of their communities and families are protected.”
The studies, which will take place in regions across the country, will be broken into two study groups. Two of the seven sites were selected as prospective case studies where EPA will monitor key aspects of the hydraulic fracturing process throughout the lifecycle of a well:
EPA invited stakeholders from across the country to participate in the identification of potential case studies through informational public meetings and the submission of electronic or written comments. Following thousands of comments, more than 40 case studies were nominated for inclusion in the study. The case studies were identified, prioritized and selected based on a rigorous set of criteria. These criteria included proximity of population and drinking water supplies to activities, concerns about impaired water quality (retrospective only) and health and environmental impacts (retrospective only), and knowledge gaps that could be filled by the case study. Sites were prioritized based on geographic and geologic diversity, population at risk, site status (planned, active or completed), unique geological or hydrology features, characteristics of water resources, and land use.
ND
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in keeping with the administration’s focus to ensure that the agency leverages domestic resources safely and responsibly, recently announced the next steps in its congressionally mandated hydraulic fracturing study. EPA has identified seven case studies to help inform the assessment of potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources. The sites identified were selected following extensive input from stakeholders – including the public, local and state officials, industry and environmental organizations. To ensure the agency maintains the current timeline for the study, the EPA has begun field work in some of the selected regions.
Natural gas plays a key role in the nation’s energy future. EPA is working closely with other federal partners to ensure that this important resource can be developed safely. “This is an important part of a process that will use the best science to help us better understand the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water,” says Paul Anastas, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Research and Development. “We’ve met with community members, state experts, and industry and environmental leaders to choose these case studies. This is about using the best possible science to do what the American people expect the EPA to do – ensure that the health of their communities and families are protected.”
The studies, which will take place in regions across the country, will be broken into two study groups. Two of the seven sites were selected as prospective case studies where EPA will monitor key aspects of the hydraulic fracturing process throughout the lifecycle of a well:
- Haynesville Shale – DeSoto Parish, La.
- Marcellus Shale – Washington County, Pa.
- Bakken Shale – Kildeer and Dunn Counties,
N.D.
- Barnett Shale – Wise and Denton Counties, Texas
- Marcellus Shale – Bradford and Susquehanna Counties,
Pa.
- Marcellus Shale – Washington County, Pa.
- Raton Basin – Las Animas County, Colo.
EPA invited stakeholders from across the country to participate in the identification of potential case studies through informational public meetings and the submission of electronic or written comments. Following thousands of comments, more than 40 case studies were nominated for inclusion in the study. The case studies were identified, prioritized and selected based on a rigorous set of criteria. These criteria included proximity of population and drinking water supplies to activities, concerns about impaired water quality (retrospective only) and health and environmental impacts (retrospective only), and knowledge gaps that could be filled by the case study. Sites were prioritized based on geographic and geologic diversity, population at risk, site status (planned, active or completed), unique geological or hydrology features, characteristics of water resources, and land use.
ND
Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!
